
U211-A Power Regulator
Features:
Power in : AC 100Vď˝?00V; Power out : AC 200V , 2kW
Voltage protection device under unstable voltage
Easily installed into fuel dispenser
100% Factory Tested.
Packing:
Weight: Dimension:
10.3kg/case of 1 150Ă—200Ă—340mm/case of 1
we are committed to create the best workplace, encourage our staffs to put their own personalities into their jobs, and provide them a stage to show themselves.
No, it is “a dreary, desolate, and
indeed quite abject and distressing one; what we might call, by way of eminence, the dismal science.�
Carlyle was a fine one to talk. He was a brooding curmudgeon who thundered against industry, progress
and the young science that sought to explain them. He found economists dismal not for the obvious
reasons, such as their dry arithmetic or their gloomy preoccupation with scarcity and subsistence. Instead,
he took against them because they were so wedded to the idea of happiness.
The economists of his day took their cue from Jeremy Bentham and his “utilitarian�philosophy. They
calculated happiness, or utility, as the sum of good feelings minus bad, and argued that the pursuit of
pleasure and the avoidance of pain were the sole springs of human action. One even looked forward to the
invention of a hedonimeter, a “psychophysical machine�that wo fuel dispenser uld record the ups and downs of a man s
feelings just as a thermometer might plot his temperature. Such people, Carlyle complained, fancied that
man was a “dead Iron-Balance for weighing Pains and Pleasures on�
The hedonimeter was never invented, and for a cent fuel dispenser ury or so economists fell silent about both weights on
man s scales. They studied outward behaviour, not inward feelings; choices made, not pleasures taken.
But in recent years, economists have become newly confident that they can measure utility as Bentham
conceived it as a quantum of pleasure or pain.
How do they do it? Mostly they just ask people. Daniel Kahneman, a psychologist at Princeton University
who won the Nobel prize for economics in 2002, reckons people are not as mysterious as less nosy
economists supposed. “The view that hedonic states cannot be measured because they are private events
is widely held but incorrect,�he and his colleagues argue. Generally, people can say ho fuel dispenser w they feel at a
given moment, on a scale of zero to ten.
And if this smacks of hearsay not science, the new “hedonimetrists�can appeal to oth