K-GA44 FUEL DISPENSER

K-GA44 FUEL DISPENSER

Pump :Type Optional

Inlet Pressure :>=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.) :55±5

Suction Distance (m): 6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type: Optional

Accuracy :±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle :Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type : Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset Function :Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price :0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price :0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer: 1~~9,999,999

Hose 4.5m

Weight 280kg

Dimension(L×W×H) : 1540*690*2210(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 29

model, double model and multi-nozzle fuel dispenser (see Diagram 1-8, 1-9 ). The two categories of suction fuel dispenser and submersible fuel dispenser is divided by pump position. Diagram 1-15: Mobile fuel dispenser Diagram 1-16: Vehicle-mounted fuel dispenser Diagram 1-17; Hanging filling system Diagram 1-18: Card-controlled fuel dispenser In addition, according to special ancillary function, there are mobile fuel dispenser (Diagram 1-15), vehicle-mounted fuel dispenser (Diagram1-16), hanging filing system (Diagram1-17), fuel d fuel dispenser ispenser with vapor recovery device (Diagram1-7), mixed product fuel dispenser available to change product label (Diagram1-10), fuel dispenser communicated with upper network (Diagram1-12), fuel dispenser subject to upper network (Diagram1-11), card-controlled fuel dispenser (Diagram1-18), etc. Article IV Basic working principle and configuration of fuel d fuel dispenser ispenser Basic working principle. The basic working principle of fuel dispenser can be illustrated by the following chart 1-19, the line with arrow presenting flow direction of oil, line denoting the transmission direction of mechanical or electric sign. Diagram 1- 19: Working process of fuel dispenser Fuel is sucked from underground tank, enter measurement transducer via vapor separator, and flow out nozzle through solenoid valve. The position movement value of axis generated by transducer is converted into relevant electric pulse sign by sensor, the indicator of electric counter display accumulative volume refueled. If in mechanical fuel dispenser, the volume refueled can be presented by the indicator device of mechanical counter by measuring the position movement of output axis of converter. The pump of submersible fuel dispenser is installed in oil in tank, which can delivery fuel to several measurement transducers, and flow out nozzle. Its counter device is similar to pump built-in fuel dispenser. The current fuel d fuel dispenser

or delivery note)　　2. Loyalty　　3. Card Payment　　4. Other Payment details (coupon cash)　　5. Deposit receipt (to claim back the deposit)　　One receipt might be printed through a sequence of requests. Each request is queued up and must be　　completed before the next one is processed; but while one application is in charge the other application　　requests will queue up until the former declares the output completed. The POS Sell application will receive　　confirmation by the EPS application that the　　Request:　　 DeviceRequest RequestType=Output ApplicationSender=POSsell001 WorkstationID=082861　　POPID=POP01 RequestID=012 fuel dispenser 54 xmlns:xsi=www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-instance　　xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation= . DeviceRequest.xsd　　 Output OutDeviceTarget=Printer　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 fuel dispenser TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 TextLine receipt line TextLine　　 Output　　 DeviceRequest　　Response:　　 DeviceResponse RequestType=Output ApplicationSender=POSsell001 WorkstationID=082861　　POPID=POP01 RequestID=01254 OverallResult=Success xmlns:xsi=www.w3.org2001XMLSchema-　　instance xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation= . DeviceResponse.xsd　　 Output OutDeviceTarget=Printer OutResult=Success　　August 2002 IFSF STANDARD FORECOURT PROTOCOL fuel dispenser

pennies, which would surely have claimed if it could. Other big institutions habitually pass up opportunities to retrieve from the courts what they have lost in the markets. A study by James Cox, a colleague of Mr McGovern s at Duke, of 118 securities class-action suits between 1995 and 2002, published in the Stanford Law Review last month, concludes that 72% of institutions never claim their full share of the proceeds. Mr Cox offers several explanations institutions distaste for a form of litigation that, as they see it, benefits mainly lawyers; low expected gains; and the cost and hassle of claiming. Institutions using s fuel dispenser everal brokers would find it a nightmare to reconstitute trading records to show that purchases and sale of shares tally with the publication of flawed research. Merely keeping up with all the settlements is a job in itself. Garden City, a legal-administration service, recently sent out a blanket proposed settlement for 298 initial public offerings that t fuel dispenser ook place in 1999 and 2000. WorldCom alone is due to pay holders of 48 different securities claims, backed by trading records, must be filed both with the Securities and Exchange Commission and with the private law firms handling litigation in New York. There is no complete public list of pending litigation. Institutional Shareholder Services, of Washington, DC, which tracks and responds to lawsuits for institutions, says its business has grown faster than its wildest projections. For individuals, there is no help and the process can be maddening. In 2003, for example, Lucent, a telecoms- equipment maker, agreed to a $517m settlement. Of this, $100m plus expenses went to plaintiffs lawyers. The rest was split among shareholders who could satisfy numerous conditions and use various formulas to calculate an applicable loss, which by the time the cheques arrived last year worked out at as little as a cent on the dollar. A unique case? Petitions for repayment from a $67m fund are due at the end of March for shareholders fuel dispenser